Eric Tonnsen has carved out a successful practice defending serious personal injury, wrongful death, and construction defect lawsuits on behalf of corporations, contractors, insurance companies, trucking companies, and retail businesses. From local transportation businesses to Fortune 500 companies with global reach, Eric is experienced in all phases of civil defense practice including expert discovery, emergency response, complex and high-value damages evaluations, and trial.Email Eric
Amy Price serves as Eric Tonnsen’s paralegal.
Education & Experience
Eric grew up in Greer, SC, before receiving undergraduate and law degrees from the University of South Carolina. He was a member of the South Carolina Law Review where his article, Henson v. International Paper Co., A Step Backwards in South Carolina Attractive Nuisance Jurisprudence, 56 S.C. L. Rev. 835 was published and later cited by the South Carolina Supreme Court in Henson v. International Paper Company, 374 S.C. 375 (2007).
Eric Tonnsen’s representative cases include:
- Defense of Fortune 50 home improvement retailer in personal injury litigation throughout South Carolina. Cases handled include false arrest, injuries to children, alleged brain injuries, and other significant personal injury.
- Defense of regional commercial motor carrier in I-85 accident in which multiple children were injured and their grandfather was killed. Involvement in case included emergency response to scene of accident and handling of matter through litigation and settlement at mediation.
- Defense verdict in Anderson County Court of Common Pleas – December 2011. Week long trial involving tractor-trailer accident in which the plaintiff underwent surgeries to her knee and femur and incurred approximately $160,000 in medical bills. Plaintiff’s counsel suggested the jury return a verdict in excess of $1M.
- Defense verdict in Greenville County Court of Common Pleas – June 2012. Week long trial representing Global 500 company in personal injury case involving alleged permanent disability of a police officer. Plaintiff’s counsel requested a verdict in excess of $3M.